Click this button-link is so that you can safely exit this website quickly Click this button-link is so that you can quickly find the help you need

Programs

Attachment, Self-Regulation, and Competency (ARC)

Overview

Delivery Approach:
  • Individual
  • Group
  • Group & Individual
  • Dyadic
Delivery Format:
  • In-Person
  • Virtual
  • Hybrid
Provider Requirements:
  • No Provider Requirements
Type of Experience Addressed:
  • Domestic Violence
  • Child Abuse 
  • Sexual Abuse
  • Community Violence
  • Neglect 
  • Family Separation
  • Substance Abusing Caregiver 
  • Reunification
  • Homelessness
  • Verbal/Emotional abuse
  • Mental Health Issues/Concerns
  • Systemic/Interpersonal Racism
  • Historical trauma
  • Other Experiences Addressed
    • Complex Developmental Trauma
Engagement Methods:
  • Talk-Based
  • Experiential
  • Somatic
  • Play-based
  • Culturally-Grounded
Level of Intervention:
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Intervention
Length
  • Greater than 12 weeks
Setting:
  • School
  • Home 
  • Hospital-based
  • Residential 
  • Domestic Violence Shelter
  • Correctional
  • Homeless Shelter
  • Headstart and Early Education Programs
  • Day Care
  • Family service agencies
  • Health Services 
  • Foster Care 
  • Mental Health Setting
  • Community-based agency
Program Details:

The Attachment, Self-Regulation, and Competency (ARC) (Blaustein & Kinniburgh, 2010; Kinniburgh & Blaustein, 2005) treatment framework is a components-based model that was designed to be flexibly applied with children across demographic and treatment settings, and ranging in age from early childhood through late adolescence / early adulthood. It was specifically designed to be applicable with children in the range of caregiving settings, including substitute care, and has been successfully applied in five countries, in urban and rural settings, with various cultural groups, and by a wide range of providers and provider systems. The framework was developed to target the needs of children and families exposed to complex trauma, and addresses the core areas of complex trauma impact and necessary intervention identified by experts in the field. Outcomes with youth and families indicate reductions in negative behavioral and emotional indicators, and increases in adaptive behaviors.

ARC targets 8 core skills within the three primary domains identified above, with a primary unifying goal of trauma experience integration. Core components framework designed to be adaptable to the range of child and family serving systems. Components operate on a dual level, incorporating both an organizational frame as well as clinical intervention strategies.

Theoretical basis:

The ARC framework targets the needs of children who have experienced complex trauma by targeting multiple levels relevant to outcomes for this population:

The framework focuses on strengthening the caregiving system surrounding children through enhancing supports, skills, and relational resources for adult caregivers. Caregiver functioning has a significant impact on mental health outcomes for trauma-impacted children, and in the case of families at risk for inadequate caregiving will impact placement stability and risk for further victimization. It is anticipated that caregiving systems receiving intervention will demonstrate improved mental health status, decreased incidence of removal, and decreased reports of stress related to parenting.

The framework addresses a core driving factor in negative outcomes among youth who have experienced complex trauma – namely, dysregulation of emotion, physiology, and behavior. Through targeting awareness and skill in managing internal experience, it is anticipated that youth will demonstrate decreased pathology and improved behavioral functioning.

The framework addresses key factors associated with resilience in stress-impacted populations, including executive function / problem-solving skills and sense of identity. A goal of intervention utilizing this framework is to go beyond pathology reduction, and to increase positive / resilient outcomes among youth receiving intervention.

Program setting:

The framework has been integrated into a wide range of child- and family-serving settings, including outpatient treatment, inpatient treatment, day programs, residential and group care, foster care, schools, early intervention / Head Start, in-home parenting support, and family shelter programs.

Length of program/number of sessions:

Length varies by application and treatment setting, and has ranged from very short-term adaptations (2 week intensive treatment settings) to long-term residential care. Given the complex population, the expectation is that treatment is typically at least 6-12 months in length.

Type(s) of trauma/concerns addressed:

Designed to target complex trauma in children and families.

Types of service providers:

Core concepts of the framework have been taught to and applied by a wide range of service providers, from family partners with lived experience to licensed mental health clinicians. Method of using the intervention framework varies by role and setting.

Age range of children served:

Birth to young adulthood, along with their caregiving systems.

Parent/adult caregiver(s) included in intervention:

The caregiving system is a primary target of intervention.

Ethnic/racial and other groups served:

The framework has been used broadly within the United States in varying contexts, including rural / urban / suburban settings; with varied socioeconomic status; and with families from widely diverse racial and ethnic background. Lead trainers and consultants work with systems implementing the framework to adapt concept delivery to meet the needs of the population served by the system.

Specific cultural adaptations:

Languages that service/resource is available: Primary manual / text is available in English and Dutch; a Turkish translation is anticipated in late 2015. Limited Spanish language materials are available.

Date Added/Updated:

9/15/15

Population Served

Age:
  • 0-5 (Early Childhood)
  • 6-12 (Childhood)
  • 13-17 (Adolescent)
  • 18-25 (Young Adult)
  • 25 & Up (Adult)
Population Language:
  • English
  • Other Population Language
    • Limited materials available in other languages
Ethnic Racial Group:
  • Indigenous People – American Indian/Native American, Alaskan Native
  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
  • White
Client/Audience:
  • Child and Non-Abusive Parent/Caregiver
  • Child
  • Family
  • Foster/Adoptive Parent
  • Other Client/Audience:
    • Systems of care (e.g., milieu programs)
Population Adaptations:
Ethnic/racial and other groups served:

The framework has been used broadly within the United States in varying contexts, including rural / urban / suburban settings; with varied socioeconomic status; and with families from widely diverse racial and ethnic background. Lead trainers and consultants work with systems implementing the framework to adapt concept delivery to meet the needs of the population served by the system.

Specific cultural adaptations:

Languages that service/resource is available: Primary manual / text is available in English and Dutch; a Turkish translation is anticipated in late 2015. Limited Spanish language materials are available.

Core components framework designed to be adaptable to the range of child and family serving systems. Components operate on a dual level, incorporating both an organizational frame as well as clinical intervention strategies.

Evaluation

Foundation:

The ARC framework targets the needs of children who have experienced complex trauma by targeting multiple levels relevant to outcomes for this population:

The framework focuses on strengthening the caregiving system surrounding children through enhancing supports, skills, and relational resources for adult caregivers. Caregiver functioning has a significant impact on mental health outcomes for trauma-impacted children, and in the case of families at risk for inadequate caregiving will impact placement stability and risk for further victimization. It is anticipated that caregiving systems receiving intervention will demonstrate improved mental health status, decreased incidence of removal, and decreased reports of stress related to parenting.

The framework addresses a core driving factor in negative outcomes among youth who have experienced complex trauma – namely, dysregulation of emotion, physiology, and behavior. Through targeting awareness and skill in managing internal experience, it is anticipated that youth will demonstrate decreased pathology and improved behavioral functioning.

The framework addresses key factors associated with resilience in stress-impacted populations, including executive function / problem-solving skills and sense of identity. A goal of intervention utilizing this framework is to go beyond pathology reduction, and to increase positive / resilient outcomes among youth receiving intervention.

Evaluation Studies:

In a young (0-12) child-welfare-involved population in Alaska, 92% of children completing treatment utilizing ARC achieved permanency in placement (adoptive, pre-adoptive, or biological family reunification), compared with a 40% permanency rate after one year for the state as a whole. Further, children who completed ARC treatment and had both a baseline and discharge data collection point exhibited a 17.2 point drop in overall CBCL T-scores, with a marked reduction from 85th to 49th percentile in Behavioral Concerns as measured by the CBCL (Arvidson et al, 2011)

In pre-/post analyses using HLM multi-level regression, adoptive children and their families completing an adapted 16-week ARC-based treatment demonstrated significant decrease in PTSD symptoms utilizing the CAPS; significant reduction in broad behavioral symptoms according to both self-report (TSC-C) and maternal report (BASC); and increase in maternal-reported adaptive skills (BASC). Both mothers and fathers demonstrated reduced distress on the Parenting Stress Index. (BCS-ADOPTS; Hodgdon, Blaustein, Kinniburgh, Peterson, & Spinazzola, In press)

Examining the pool of children served by sites within the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, the final report of the Cross-Site Evaluation of NCTSN activities and services between 2005 and 2009 (produced in 2010 by the independent evaluator IFC Marco) indicated that children receiving ARC-based treatment services demonstrated consistent significant reductions in behavioral problems and post-traumatic stress disorder that were equivalent to those observed in children receiving TF-CBT (ICF Macro, 2010, December).

In residential programs serving adolescent girls, systemic implementation (including individual and group treatment, staff training, and milieu components), youth demonstrated significant reductions in behavior problems (CBCL) and PTSD symptoms (UCLA PTSD Index). In addition, significant reductions were demonstrated in use of physical restraint by staff over the course of the intervention period (Kinniburgh et al., 2012).

Preliminary data from a statewide ILC initiative targeting children in DCFS involved families (n=52) in Illinois indicates significant reductions across time points in clinician-rated child trauma symptoms (grief, reexperiencing, avoidance, numbing, dissociation, adjustment to trauma) as well as in a range of emotional and behavioral needs (i.e., anxiety, anger control, somatization) as measured by the CANS (Kisiel, Torgerson & Villa, January 2013)

 

Publications:
  • Hodgdon, H., Blaustein, M., Kinniburgh, K., Peterson, M. & Spinazzola, J. (2015, in press). Application of the ARC model with adopted children: Supporting resiliency and family well being. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, in press.
  • Blaustein, M. and Kinniburgh, K. (2015). When age doesn’t match stage: Challenges and considerations in services for transition-age youth with histories of developmental trauma. Focal Point: Youth, Young Adults, & Mental Health. Trauma-Informed Care, 29, 17-20.
  • Ford, J., Blaustein, M., Habib, M., and Kagan, R. (2013). Developmental Trauma Disorder-Focused Interventions for Traumatized Children and Adolescents. In J. D. Ford & C. A. Courtois (Ed.) (2012). Treating complex traumatic stress disorders in children: An evidence-based guide. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Ford, J. & Blaustein, M. (2013). Systemic self-regulation: A framework for trauma-informed services in residential juvenile justice programs. Journal of Family Violence, 28.
  • Hodgdon, H., Kinniburgh, K., Gabowitz, D., Blaustein, M. & Spinazzola, J. (2013). Development and implementation of trauma-informed programming in residential schools using the ARC framework. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 679-692.
  • Arvidson, J., Kinniburgh, K., Howard, K., Spinazzola, J., Strothers, H., Evans, M., Andres, B., Cohen, C. & Blaustein, M. (2011). Treatment of complex trauma in young children: Developmental and cultural considerations in applications of the ARC intervention model. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 4, 34-51
  • Blaustein, M. & Kinniburgh, K. (2007). Intervening beyond the child: The intertwining nature of attachment and trauma. Briefing Paper: Attachment Theory Into Practice. British Psychological Society, Briefing Paper 26, 48-53.
  • Kinniburgh, K., Blaustein, M., Spinazzola, J., & van der Kolk, B. (2005). Attachment, Self-Regulation, and Competency: A comprehensive intervention framework for children with complex trauma. Psychiatric Annals, 35(5), 424 – 430.

 

Rated/Reviewed by Evidence Based Registries:

The National Traumatic Stress Network Treatments and Practices, Trauma Interventions 

Training & Resources

Training Language:
  • English
Training Available:
  • Yes, in open-registration workshops several times a year, as well as by contract directly with sponsoring agencies. Typical process involves initial training followed by extended consultation.
Training Details:
Training manuals/protocols:

Blaustein, M. & Kinniburgh, K. (2010). Treating traumatic stress in children and adolescents: How to foster resilience through attachment, self-regulation, and competency. New York: Guilford Press.

Training Contact:

Margaret E. Blaustein, Ph.D.

info@centerfortraumatraining.org
Information about ARC training and consultation and agencies interested in receiving training can request further information here.

Program Contact

Margaret E. Blaustein, Ph.D.
1269 Beacon Street
Brookline, MA 02446
617-232-1303, ext. 214

General Information About ARC
Information Specifically For Providers